[c-nsp] multicast on layer 2
Andrew K Ho
aho at yorku.ca
Mon Jun 27 09:27:57 EDT 2005
I'm afraid this setup is just on layer 2. Two directly connected switches
on trunk links, both allowing the same vlan. Although there is a vlan
interface on the router, the traffic shouldn't be processed by the router.
Hence no need for PIM (as Jeff pointed out). For reasons I can't fathom,
IGMP snooping is always off on our network, and as our planners want it to
remain this way, the IGMP querier feature would not make any difference.
Thx for all the replies.
Andy
Tim Stevenson <tstevens at cisco.com>
06/24/2005 03:57 PM
To
Andrew K Ho <aho at yorku.ca>, cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
cc
Subject
Re: [c-nsp] multicast on layer 2
You might try:
* enabling PIM on an SVI in that VLAN
* enabling the IGMP querier feature
* disabling IGMP snooping (not really advisable, floods to all ports)
For IGMP snooping to work properly, an IGMP querier MUST be present in the
VLAN.
See:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/38.html
HTH,
Tim
At 12:28 PM 6/24/2005, Andrew K Ho declared:
>Hi, I was hoping someone could help me on this.
>
>I'm having a problem with an application on our network called Drive
Image
>Pro (used to push pc images to build client machines), which purports to
>be a multicast application, but which is only being used at layer 2 as
all
>traffic btn server and client is contained in 1 vlan, hence is working
>essentially the same as broadcasts. Howevever, the server and client
send
>multicast packets to a multicast address to send packets.
>
>The server is connected to Model / Serial cisco WS-C6509 OS / Version
>ios / 12.1(22)E2 on a 100m connection and the client is connected to a
>100m port on Model / Serial cisco 4506 OS / Version ios / 12.2(20)EW .
>They are connected directly through a trunk link, running at gig on
fiber.
> The server and client are pingable from either side so there is no
>reachability issue.
>
>If the server and client are both on the 4506, it works fine, but won't
>work if connected as described above. There are no configs affecting
>multicast packets.
>
>Has anyone come across a problem like this or have any clue as to why it
>may not be working?
>
>Thx in advance
>
>Andy
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Tim Stevenson, tstevens at cisco.com
Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
Technical Marketing Engineer, Catalyst 6500
Cisco Systems, http://www.cisco.com
IP Phone: 408-526-6759
********************************************************
The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
and are intended for the specified recipients only.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list