[c-nsp] HIGH RANGE INPUT - 6509 power supply

Voll, Scott Scott.Voll at wesd.org
Thu Jun 30 13:20:19 EDT 2005


That's the difference.  With 2500 you run in redundant mode rather then
combined mode.  In Redundant you can loose a PS and still be up.

Scott


Router1#sh power
system power redundancy mode = redundant
system power total =     2331.00 Watts (55.50 Amps @ 42V)
system power used =      1186.08 Watts (28.24 Amps @ 42V)
system power available = 1144.92 Watts (27.26 Amps @ 42V)
                        Power-Capacity PS-Fan Output Oper
PS   Type               Watts   A @42V Status Status State
---- ------------------ ------- ------ ------ ------ -----
1    WS-CAC-2500W       2331.00 55.50  OK     OK     on
2    WS-CAC-2500W       2331.00 55.50  OK     OK     on
                        Pwr-Requested  Pwr-Allocated  Admin Oper
Slot Card-Type          Watts   A @42V Watts   A @42V State State
---- ------------------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ----- -----
1    WS-X6148-GE-TX      103.74  2.47   103.74  2.47  on    on
3    WS-X6348-RJ-45      100.38  2.39   100.38  2.39  on    on
4    WS-X6182-2PA         99.96  2.38    99.96  2.38  on    on
5    WS-SUP720-BASE      315.00  7.50   315.00  7.50  on    on
6    WS-SUP720-BASE      315.00  7.50   315.00  7.50  on    on
9    WS-SVC-CMM          252.00  6.00   252.00  6.00  on    on

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of info at beprojects.com
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:09 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] HIGH RANGE INPUT - 6509 power supply

We have two in there, but it appears that it could run on one.  From the 
info below, the Sup 720 itself only needs 315W.


Cat6509#sh mod
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model 
Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ 
-----------
   1   16  SFM-capable 16 port 10/100/1000mb RJ45 WS-X6516-GE-TX 
SAL082187VD
   3    8  8 port 1000mb GBIC Enhanced QoS        WS-X6408A-GBIC 
SAL08186AJV
   5    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Active)         WS-SUP720-BASE 
SAD081506VU
   6    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot)            WS-SUP720-BASE 
SAD081909WT
   9   48  48 port 10/100/1000mb EtherModule      WS-X6148-GE-TX 
SAD082205BC


Cat6509#show power
system power redundancy mode = combined
system power total =     1921.92 Watts (45.76 Amps @ 42V)
system power used =       962.64 Watts (22.92 Amps @ 42V)
system power available =  959.28 Watts (22.84 Amps @ 42V)
                         Power-Capacity PS-Fan Output Oper
PS   Type               Watts   A @42V Status Status State
---- ------------------ ------- ------ ------ ------ -----
1    WS-CAC-2500W       1153.32 27.46  OK     OK     on
2    WS-CAC-2500W       1153.32 27.46  OK     OK     on
                         Pwr-Requested  Pwr-Allocated  Admin Oper
Slot Card-Type          Watts   A @42V Watts   A @42V State State
---- ------------------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ----- -----
1    WS-X6516-GE-TX      144.90  3.45   144.90  3.45  on    on
3    WS-X6408A-GBIC       84.00  2.00    84.00  2.00  on    on
5    WS-SUP720-BASE      315.00  7.50   315.00  7.50  on    on
6    WS-SUP720-BASE      315.00  7.50   315.00  7.50  on    on
9    WS-X6148-GE-TX      103.74  2.47   103.74  2.47  on    on


Duncan Maccubbin wrote:
>  Does it run on one? Our 6500s will not with SUP2s.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
info at beprojects.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 8:29 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] HIGH RANGE INPUT - 6509 power supply
> 
> We have the 2500W plugged into 110v, so they only act like 1300W and it 
> works fine.
> 
> 
> Voll, Scott wrote:
> 
>>I believe you must have the 2500w for the sup 720.
>>
>>Scott
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of noc ops
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 3:41 PM
>>To: Dave Temkin
>>Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] HIGH RANGE INPUT - 6509 power supply
>>
>>I'm guessing if I had ip phones drawing power off this unit then I would 
>>need to worry about 2500W output otherwise I guess I'm ok w/ 1300W 
>>output using 110v for server farms.
>>
>>
>>regards,
>>/vicky
>>
>>
>>Dave Temkin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>You need to run it at 200-240V to get 2500W out of it, otherwise it'll
>>>just run at 1300W.
>>>
>>>-Dave
>>>
>>>On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, noc ops wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>Just trying to understand the reading off my 6509 PWS which reads on the
>>>>unit itself:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>LOW RANGE
>>>>Input (ac)
>>>>100 - 200v
>>>>50/60 Hz
>>>>16 A
>>>>1300w maximum output power
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>HIGH RANGE
>>>>Input (ac)
>>>>200 - 240v
>>>>50/60 Hz
>>>>16 A
>>>>2500w maximum output power
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Does high range input imply, 2500w if both inputs are 110v?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>regards,
>>>>/vicky
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3291 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20050630/8d5e2ec7/smime-0001.bin


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list