[c-nsp] Re: 2600 load balancing

[Bryan Fetzer]

Alban/Cisco-NSP crew, 
Is there a noticeable performance hit if using MLP vs load balancing via
a routing protocol? Ie is one or the other better from a pure
performance standpoint? 

Thanks, 
Bryan, 

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:41:33 -0500
From: "Andriy A. Yerofyeyev" <andriy at improcom.com>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2600 load balancing
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <4228D60D.2030501 at improcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi Dani !

I use MLP , its provide good redundancy. Also you may use OSPF for load 
balancing. In my case 2620 connected to my 7200.

If you have 2 T1 from different ISP - its really interesting question;)

> 
> I have a cisco 2620 (MPC860) router with two T1-s connected to it.
> 
> What would be the best method to load balance the traffic between the
two?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alban
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
>