[c-nsp] re: 2600 load balancing

[Vandy Hamidi]

Sorry, Josh it was directed for Alban.

I noticed your commend on MLPPP on Cisco.  I've used it and it works
well for shared voice and data networks.  Using interlacing and
fragmentation, MLPPP can help to reduce jitter on circuits where data
and voice compete.

Be aware, some MPLS providers don't support interlacing and may ask you
not to use it.  The beauty of private links,

	-=Vandy=-

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Gentry [mailto:jgentry at swcp.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 11:24 AM
To: Vandy Hamidi
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] re: 2600 load balancing

Vandy,

Are you refering to the original question?  That was not Josh.

Thanks,

Josh

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:19:24AM -0800, Vandy Hamidi wrote:
> 
> Josh,
> This isn't a cut and dry question.  It depends on what type of data
you
> are sending over the link (voip, CIFS, internet, etc).  What type of
> link it is, HDLC, PPP, Frame, etc.  Private link or provider link
(i.e.
> do you have control of both ends).
> 
> Get that info back to the list and we can help.
> 
> Also, I recommend do your research on serialization delays and T1 Link
> aggregation online.  There are enormous amounts of information on this
> topic that will do a far better job of explaining your question.
> 
> Getting the answer from the list is just part of it. You need to
> understand the answer because situations alter the right design.
> 
> 	-=Vandy=-
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Josh Gentry
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 7:34 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] re: 2600 load balancing
> 
> Hi.  I'm new to the list and  responding to a thread I saw in the 
> archive.  Subject of the thread is 2600 load balancing.  The question 
> was about load balancing across 2 T1's.
> 
> >I have a cisco 2620 (MPC860) router with two T1-s connected to it.
> > 
> > What would be the best method to load balance the traffic between
the
> two?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Alban
> > _____________________
> 
> There has been a resulting discussion of using multilink PPP.  I do
not 
> personally have experience with MLPPP with Cisco's, so I can not
comment
> 
> on that, except I've read it can increase processor load.  What I do 
> have experience with is the per-packet load balancing with CEF.  I've 
> written a little doc about it that might be helpful.  Feedback also 
> appreciated.
> 
> http://www.joshgentry.com/cisco/cisco-load.html
> 
> Thanks,
> Josh
> 
> -- 
> Josh Gentry 
> help at swcp.com * jgentry at swcp.com *  505-232-7992
> Good Art Lives at http://www.jkdrummond.com/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Josh Gentry 
help at swcp.com * jgentry at swcp.com *  505-232-7992
Good Art Lives at http://www.jkdrummond.com/