[c-nsp] Converting ATM to VLAN
Dan Armstrong
dan at beanfield.com
Wed Mar 16 10:25:33 EST 2005
A router is not really a layer2 device, and you using it here as a
switch. A WS-X5158 or 5161 LANE card in a 5500 switch does exactly what
you want to do en mass...
Clayton Zekelman wrote:
>I have a situation where I have ATM PVC's coming in (Bridged RFC 1483) and
>need to convert it to a VLAN dot1q trunk. I'm doing this for a handful of
>paths, as the ATM enabled router is not the router I need the path to end
>up on. If it were, I'd likely do ATM RBE.
>
>I do the following:
>
>interface ATM0/0/0.48 point-to-point
> description MNS-191+B VLAN 48 IP Transit
> bridge-group 48
> pvc MNS-191+B 1/70
> ubr 12500
> encapsulation aal5snap
> !
>!
>interface FastEthernet0/0/0.48
> description MNS-191+B IP Transit
> encapsulation dot1Q 48
> bridge-group 48
>!
>bridge 48 protocol ieee
>bridge 48 route ip
>
>For some reason, things don't work properly unless I add:
>
>interface BVI48
> no ip address
>
>Can anyone shed any light on why I need to add the BVI? It *appears* to do
>nothing:
>
>uacA1#show bridge 48 ver
>
>Total of 300 station blocks, 281 free
>Codes: P - permanent, S - self
>
>BG Hash Address Action Interface VC Age RX count TX
>count
>48 5F/0 0005.5ea1.5f00
>forward Fa0/0/0.48 - 0 885110 892382
>48 CC/0 00d0.ffb5.cc00
>forward ATM0/0/0.48 15 0 892633 884682
>
>Flood ports (BG 48) RX count TX count
>ATM0/0/0.48 249 213
>FastEthernet0/0/0.48 213 249
>
>The strange thing is, when we cut over, it worked fine without the BVI for
>an hour or two, then the whole thing went down, and wouldn't come back up
>until I added the BVI.
>
>
>
>---
>Clayton Zekelman
>Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi)
>344-300 Tecumseh Rd. E.
>Windsor, Ontario
>N8X 5E8
>
>tel. 519-985-8410
>fax. 519-258-3009
>
>
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list