[c-nsp] Redistributing Eigrp in Eigrp

[Thanh Huong TRAN]

Hi all,

I advertise you to handle the right policy in redistributing between 
both eigrp protocols .

By my experience, eigrp was very bad to handle route in loop and 
consuming a lot of CPU for .

Best Regards,

tth .

Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
>>We have to AS and we don't want to run bgp, instead we want eigrp
>>running betn AS. 
>>
>>Will the below mentioned conf. of 172.98.1.1 (eth. addr) will work ?
>>
>>
>>router eigrp 33
>> redistribute static
>> redistribute eigrp 1
>> network 172.4.0.0
>> network 172.98.0.0
>> no auto-summary
>>!
>>router eigrp 1
>> redistribute static
>> network 172.1.0.0
>> network 172.98.0.0
>> no auto-summary
>>!
> 
> 
> It should work, but not sure if I'd recommend using EIGRP between two
> AS. At least consider using summaries between the two AS' to limit the
> query range.
> 
> 	oli
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
>