[c-nsp] IPv6 subnets for point-to-point links

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

 /127's for p2p...

 no reason not too.

--bill


On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 05:17:05PM +0200, Marcel Lammerse wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> according to the documentation I'm reading, it is not recommended to  
> assign /127 subnets on IPv6 point-to-point links since it breaks some  
> IPv6 mechanisms. An example is duplicate-address-detection (dad),  
> which uses a subnet-router anycast address, that would conflict with  
> one of the two available address on the link. However, the same  
> documentation mentions that it was popular practice on the 6bone.
> 
> This confuses me.
> 
> Is it or is it not safe practice to use /127  instead of the  
> recommended /64 and waste a lot of address? What are people typically  
> using?
> 
> Thanks,
> Marcel
> 
> --
> Sponges grow in the ocean. That just kills me. I wonder how much  
> deeper the ocean would be if that didn't happen
>                                                                         
>                Steven Wright
> 
> Marcel Lammerse
> lammerse at xs4all.nl
> 
> 


> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/