[c-nsp] IPv6 subnets for point-to-point links

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:25:05PM +0000, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> 	geoffs 0.94 work is interesting, but
> 	neglects the savings/longevity of "violating"
> 	the /64 restriction.

So how much savings (in terms of /48) do you estimate if all networks
world wide change from using /64s for all transfer networks to /112.../126 
(depending on the number of nodes)?

Changing the /64 recommendation for "normal" LAN segments (with autoconfig
etc.) is something I'd see quite some value in - more wiggle room to the
front - but as has been said before "this is going to be hard and painful".

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de