[c-nsp] Re: IPv6 Route "tag" attribute?

[Dave McGaugh]

Hmm, I had been told it would be in 12.2(25)S4, but hadn't had time  
to check. Its good to know that you have confirmed that it isn't, so  
that saves me the work. :)

The information I got re: 12.2(26)S, if it is in 26S, that release  
might not ever exist or could be a long ways off (can't remember the  
reasoning).

All that having said, it seems pretty ridiculous to release IPv6  
capable software while leaving out such an important feature as it  
makes constructing any half-way sophisticated redistribution policy  
impossible. Luckily there are other vendors with more full-featured  
IPv6 support.

-Dave

On May 27, 2005, at 12:05 AM, Colin Whittaker wrote:

> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 05:25:15PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 05:22:08PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 03:42:41PM +0100, David Freedman wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anybody know when this feature is going to arrive
>>>> (or if arrived, where is it?)
>>>>
>>>> Router(conf)#
>>>> ipv6 route  2001:A88::FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF/128 2001:A88::1 tag ?
>>>>
>>>> % Unrecognized command
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, ipv6 route tag/name would be _really_ appreciated.
>>>
>>
>> BTW, I was thinking of 12.2S. 12.3T has "tag", but no "name".
>>
>
> CSCuk52253 lists 12.2(25.4)S01 as the release which intergrates the  
> fix.
>
> Now my reading of that version number is that it is the fourth interim
> build of 12.2(25)S1 and so it should be in 12.2(25)S2 but it isn't,  
> nor
> is it in S4, so I hold out hope for 12.2(26)S
>
> Still waiting to hear if/when it will be put into 12.0S
>
> Colin
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>