[c-nsp] BGP: 7206vxr-G1 vs. 6503 sup2
Merlin Gillespie
merlin at uk.clara.net
Mon Nov 14 12:15:32 EST 2005
Christopher McCrory wrote:
> Hello...
>
> I'm adding more horsepower in my BGP core. I am currently running
> multiple 7206VXR-300 (12.0S) with BGP/OSPF/IPv4 (for a content provider
> network, not ISP). My transit connections are all same floor FastE/GigE
> cross connects with a backup DS3.
>
> Q: any advantages to using a 6503/sup2/msfc2 instead of a
> 7206VXR-NPE-G1 ?
Although the sup2/MSFC2 platform is considerably faster than the NPE-G1
be aware that the sup2/MSFC2 will not support any form of MPLS out of
box - and will have to be augmented with an OSM to speak LDP.
This is a costly and somewhat limited alternative.
Additionally if you move to sup720 you must be fully committed to what
you intend on doing with the platform.
The sup720 is a great label swapping device and will be a P router
happily. If you require a PE then you will be looking at a minimum of
sup720 3b but probably 3bxl if you are to maintain a full internet
routing table on the device.
I believe the 3b takes 512k prefixes in it's RIB while the 3bxl takes 1M
but it could be 256k + 512k respectively.
Additionally as a PE router the NPEG1 has a much richer a suite of
interface options at lower density.
Hope that helps,
-merl
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list