[c-nsp] Cisco 7301 and PA-2FE-TX

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday 22 November 2005 15:53, Rodney Dunn wrote:

> :) I do appreciate it. But the more you talk bad about
> : a card that was marketed and deployed wrong because we
> didn't have a real dual FE port PA ready the better IMO.
> That way more people get the truth and don't take it as
> the usual "Cisco just wants me to buy new hardware just
> because" idea that IMO is too over referenced
> sometimes.

I'm curious about this - being in the market for some 
upgrades. Are we saying the "recommended" PA-2FE-TX (the 
non-ISL one) that is built to push traffic rather than 
aggregate VLAN's is the one referenced at:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2033/products_data_sheet09186a0080091c92.html

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20051122/661d42cb/attachment.bin