[c-nsp] RTBH and MPLS network

[Daemen, Seth, VF-NL]

No I thinks not that RTBH behaves differently in MPLS networks.
Butt I have configuration problems. 

In the bgp configuration is a redistribute:

static route-map black-hole-trigger

The following route map is created:

route-map black-hole-trigger, permit, sequence 10
  Match clauses:
    tag 66
  Set clauses:
    local-preference 200
    origin igp
    ip next-hop 192.0.2.1

Static route:

ip route vrf VPN_Internet 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 Null0 tag 66

This works well the route 2.2.2.2 is advertised to the other routers
also the local-preference is applied. Butt the problem is that the ip
next-hop value is ignored. The next-hop address used is the ip address
of the advertising router. 

Seth

-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:oboehmer at cisco.com] 
Sent: vrijdag 25 november 2005 14:28
To: Daemen, Seth, VF-NL; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] RTBH and MPLS network

Daemen, Seth, VF-NL <> wrote on Friday, November 25, 2005 10:54 AM:

> Does anyone have examples how to apply remotely triggered black hole
> filtering in a mpls network?

hmm, I might be missing something, but why do you think RTBH behaves
differently in MPLS networks? Your edge-LSR handles an IP packet and
drops it..

	oli