[c-nsp] Non-default BGP hold / keepalive timers
Bruce Pinsky
bep at whack.org
Mon Oct 3 16:34:49 EDT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David J. Hughes wrote:
> I'm just looking for other peoples experiences with reducing the hold
> down time of BGP peers to improve convergence time when a peer just
> disappears on you. As ethernet delivered services are becoming more
> popular the chance of having end-to-end link with the actual peer
> device is getting smaller. If the peer dies, blackholing traffic for
> the default 180 seconds just isn't good enough.
>
Start talking to your providers and peers about when they are going to
offer BFD support. This will be the preferred method since using layer 3
routing protocols as a fault detection tool has significant drawbacks.
> What are people running on their eBGP borders? I've read of some very
> aggressive timer use for iBGP sessions (i.e. running 3 * 1 second
> keepalives) but I wouldn't run that internally, let alone with an
> external peer. I can't find any BCP or similar that covers this. I
> don't really want to start tweaking them lower an lower until things
> start to flap.
>
> I am thinking about 3 * 5 seconds giving a 15 second outage in this
> situation. Thoughts?
>
I don't know that many providers are willing to tune the BGP timers on a
per customer basis at all. YMMV.
- --
=========
bep
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFDQZXpE1XcgMgrtyYRAhIpAJ9nDC9MSbpm6nXR64zU7X/36hkt3QCg9c/W
Rg7Osw8vb7XHjwqzDgeWu5E=
=j1pT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list