[c-nsp] MLPPP and ip load-sharing per-packet

[Rodney Dunn]

Yes...good point.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 03:59:43PM +0100, Tim Franklin wrote:
> > MLPPP - more overhead involved
> >         gives better load "balancing"
> >         can support fragmentation for voice
> 
> Single L3 interface.
> 
> For me, this is a *big* win, in terms of applying QoS and for all kinds of
> monitoring and reporting purposes.  YMMV.
> 
> Regards,
> Tim.
> 
> -- 
> ____________   Tim Franklin                 e: tim at colt.net 
> \C/\O/\L/\T/   Product Engineering Manager  w: www.colt.net 
>  V  V  V  V    Managed Data Services        t: +44 20 7863 5714 
> Data | Voice | Managed Services             f: +44 20 7863 5876  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/