[c-nsp] BGP routes co-existing with different local-preference

[Bruce Pinsky]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Niels Bakker wrote:
> * gert at greenie.muc.de (Gert Doering) [Wed 26 Oct 2005, 10:16 CEST]:
> 
>>On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:01:23AM +0200, Niels Bakker wrote:
>>
>>>I welcome your technical input on how to decrease failover times for 
>>>disappearing peers.
>>
>>That's what BFD is for.
> 
> 
> Isn't that broadcast-based?  Of course you cannot bother other hosts 
> connected to the same switch with your traffic unless explicitly 
> requested.
> 
> 

Nope.  Check out:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6017/products_feature_guide09186a00803fbe87.html

specifically:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6017/products_feature_guide09186a00803fbe87.html#wp1053739

- --
=========
bep

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFDYAQzE1XcgMgrtyYRAmhFAJ9rfOVNAyBPriIhGfShmY4xzxgvbgCeNxZq
oh0vokBmBwG+IBjycgpUdeE=
=JUtD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----