[c-nsp] software modularity in 12.2(18)SXF or not?

[Bruce Pinsky]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2005-09-21 08:42 +1000), Virgil wrote:
> 
>>On 19/9/05 3:35 AM, "sagupta at cisco.com" <sagupta at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Catalyst 6500 with IOS Software Modularity is planned for 12.2(18)SXF1
>>>expected in Nov/Dec.
>>
>>And on top of this there is talk about different software images for "6500"
>>and "7600" around Q1 2006.  Something about making the "6500" an Enterprise
>>device, with Enterprise features, and the "7600" a Service Provider device
>>with Service Provider features.
>>
>>Can anyone close to the 6500/7600 product team comment on this?
> 
> 
>  I hope I can answer, just as a Cisco customer. Information I have from
> Cisco is that there will not be different trains for 6500 or 7600, how ever
> rockies3 will fork two different trains. Biggest difference will be
> software modularity (does this imply QNX kernel, I don't know), the train
> that contains software modularity will be lagging behind the other train
> in features.
> 
> 

Sachin is the best person to answer these questions, but I can tell you the
information above is not completely accurate.

- --
=========
bep

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFDMaTHE1XcgMgrtyYRAtVOAJwJ2TnFGv+xDFXWmRPYFhd85zqSggCfSMbl
HTxewy3onCVMQ3Z8dTDyhCw=
=CRhe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----