[c-nsp] No 12.4T for 7500s

[Pete Templin]

Bruce Pinsky wrote:

> Alex Rubenstein wrote:
>>
>>The real question is, when will Cisco do away with BGP Scanner, and move 
>>to an event-based system. One can only hope (I am sure I am trvializing 
>>it, but I can hope).
> 
> Already done:
> 
> BGP Support for Next-Hop Address Tracking

Sorry, but NHAT only provides event-based updating in between the scan 
interval; the BGP scanner still runs every 60s.  Based on my preliminary 
and cursory evaluation, the CPU impact is not diminished whatsoever.

pt