[c-nsp] atm ubr settings?
goemon at anime.net
goemon at anime.net
Mon Apr 3 20:12:50 EDT 2006
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Roy wrote:
> It may be a bad idea. The UBR setting should not exceed the speed of
> the lowest physical link in the PVC. In my case, we have a 44 Mbps ATM
> pipe feeding many DSL customers. Too high a setting for the UBR
> results in cell drop at the DSLAM and really lousy performance.
Any authoritative source saying it is absolutely a bad idea? Anything I
can cite which is definitive on the matter?
-Dan
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list