[c-nsp] ATM/PPPoE - delivering DSL service - giving out static Ips

[Graham Wooden]

Thanks.  I do have several users authenticating against local aaa entries on
the router, but your right - this little router is not going to be able to
scale.

User are being presented each with a pvc:

ertr03.atlcore#show vpdn session

L2TP Session Information Total tunnels 1 sessions 5

LocID RemID TunID Intf          Username             State  Last Chg Uniq ID
21264 4778  4148  Vi2.1         userxxxx1            est    15:16:46 242
21266 51503 4148  Vi2.3         userxxxx2            est    15:16:43 244
21267 912   4148  Vi2.4         userxxxx3            est    15:16:42 245
21269 65434 4148  Vi2.5         userxxxx4            est    15:16:41 247
21484 53805 4148  Vi2.2         userxxxx5            est    14:58:53 462


Justin, could you explain #2?


On 4/6/06 10:41 AM, "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner at cluebyfour.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Graham Wooden wrote:
> 
>> Without the use of a Radius server to authenticate users (using local), am I
>> able to specify static IP assignments to DSL users? I have a generic pool
>> from which I am dishing out addresses. I would like to assign static
>> addresses to these users opposed to having them specify anything on their
>> modem.
>> 
>> Thoughts?  Using 12.3.10 IOS on a 2621 w/ 4pt ATM. Thanks,
> 
> You could possibly do it, but such a design will not scale well and your
> router config would start to get huge once you began adding lots of users.
> 
> I say "possibly", but I've never built a DSL aggregation system that way
> :-)
> 
> You'd need to be able to accomplish the following things:
> 1. store username/password pairs on the router - easy enough
> 2. bind a username/password pair to a specific IP address - doable, but
> setup/update is task-intensive.  The easiest way to hand that information
> back to the user is through PPPoE.
> 
> If the users are being presented to you as one PVC per customer, then you
> could treat them as separate routed interfaces and do bridging.  The issue
> with that is access control - PPPoE gives you a big advantage.
> 
> jms
> 
>