[c-nsp] PPPoE Session Limit?

Graham Wooden graham at oneringnetworks.com
Mon Apr 10 11:56:14 EDT 2006


I don't see any errors that I can tell that state that its hitting any
limit.  Below is the latest "show ppp nego", "show vtemplate", and "debug
ppp error", which has information that I can't really decrypt well.

There where no session-limits, but I went ahead and added some high-number
ones, which didn't seem to help.


*Mar  1 23:21:46.134: Vi2.6 PPP: Missed link down notification
*Mar  1 23:21:49.982: ppp198 PPP LCP not accepting sent CONFACK
*Mar  1 23:21:51.158: Vi2.6 PPP: Missed link down notification
*Mar  1 23:21:54.978: ppp199 PPP LCP not accepting sent CONFACK
*Mar  1 23:21:56.150: Vi2.6 PPP: Missed link down notification
*Mar  1 23:21:59.986: ppp200 PPP LCP not accepting sent CONFACK
*Mar  1 23:22:01.142: Vi2.6 PPP: Missed link down notification
*Mar  1 23:22:04.986: ppp201 PPP LCP not accepting sent CONFACK




Virtual access subinterface creation is globally enabled

         Active     Active    Subint  Pre-clone Pre-clone
       Interface Subinterface Capable Available   Limit
       --------- ------------ ------- --------- ---------
Vt10           0            5   Yes          --        --

Usage Summary
                      Interface   Subinterface
                      ---------   ------------
Current in use                2              5
Current free                  0              5
Total                         2             10

Cumulative created            3           2208
Cumulative freed              0           2203

Base virtual access interfaces: 2
Total create or clone requests: 2207
Cancelled create or clone requests: 0
Current request queue size: 0
Current free pending: 0
Current recycle pending: 0

Maximum request duration: 856 msec
Average request duration: 19 msec
Last request duration: 16 msec

Maximum processing duration: 856 msec
Average processing duration: 19 msec
Last processing duration: 16 msec




*Mar  1 23:18:00.070: ppp152 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, by this end
*Mar  1 23:18:00.070: ppp152 PAP: I AUTH-REQ id 2 len 34 from
"user at domain.local"
*Mar  1 23:18:00.070: ppp152 PAP: Authenticating peer user at domain.local
*Mar  1 23:18:00.070: ppp152 PPP: Phase is FORWARDING, Attempting Forward
*Mar  1 23:18:00.074: ppp152 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, Unauthenticated
User
*Mar  1 23:18:00.074: ppp152 PPP: Phase is FORWARDING, Attempting Forward
*Mar  1 23:18:00.078: ppp152 PPP: Send Message[Connect Local]
*Mar  1 23:18:00.098: ppp152 PPP: Bind to [Virtual-Access2.6]
*Mar  1 23:18:00.098: Vi2.6 PPP: Send Message[Static Bind Response]
*Mar  1 23:18:00.106: Vi2.6 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, Authenticated User
*Mar  1 23:18:00.110: Vi2.6 PAP: O AUTH-ACK id 2 len 5
*Mar  1 23:18:00.110: Vi2.6 PPP: Phase is UP
*Mar  1 23:18:00.114: Vi2.6 PPP: Process pending ncp packets
*Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP: I CONFREQ [Not negotiated] id 1 len 34
*Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP:    Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000)
*Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP:    PrimaryDNS 0.0.0.0 (0x810600000000)
*Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP:    SecondaryDNS 0.0.0.0 (0x830600000000)
*Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP:    PrimaryWINS 0.0.0.0 (0x820600000000)
*Mar  1 23:18:00.170: Vi2.6 IPCP:    SecondaryWINS 0.0.0.0 (0x840600000000)
*Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 3 len 40 protocol IPCP
*Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP:  (0x80210101002203060000000081060000)
*Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP:  (0x00008306000000008206000000008406)
*Mar  1 23:18:00.174: Vi2.6 LCP:  (0x00000000)
*Mar  1 23:18:00.226: Vi2.6 LCP: I TERMREQ [Open] id 3 len 4
*Mar  1 23:18:00.230: Vi2.6 LCP: O TERMACK [Open] id 3 len 4
*Mar  1 23:18:00.230: Vi2.6 PPP: Sending Acct Event[Down] id[3378]
*Mar  1 23:18:00.230: Vi2.6 PPP: Phase is TERMINATING
*Mar  1 23:18:00.294: Vi2.6 PPP: Block vaccess from being freed [0x18]
*Mar  1 23:18:01.110: Vi2.6 PPP: Missed link down notification
*Mar  1 23:18:01.110: Vi2.6 LCP: State is Closed
*Mar  1 23:18:01.110: Vi2.6 PPP: Phase is DOWN


On 4/10/06 11:45 AM, "Kristofer Sigurdsson" <kristosig at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2006/4/10, Marko Milivojevic <markom at pangalactic.net>:
>> 
>> You didn't provide any equipment details, so answering 100% correctly is a
>> bit difficult. However, you could be hitting several limits. Two of the most
>> likely are number of usable VC's on ATM interface (if you're using one) and
>> the other is platform IDB limit.
> 
> If it's an IDB limit, you should see errors about that.  On many
> platforms, you have a default session limit, which you can change
> manually.  However, that should also be in the logs if that's the
> problem.
> 
> -Kristo
> 
> 




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list