[c-nsp] PPPoE Session Limit?

[Larry Smith]

On Monday 10 April 2006 12:53, Graham Wooden wrote:
> But there was nothing in that netblock, other than the router itself, 200
> to 253 being used for DSL clients.  The pool started at 200.
>
> On 4/10/06 1:41 PM, "Larry Smith" <lesmith at ecsis.net> wrote:
> > On Monday 10 April 2006 12:26, Graham Wooden wrote:
> >> Holy cats - thanks Eugene and Joe.  That was it!
> >>
> >> So, what's the relations between having the address on the loopback and
> >> the '5' limit?
> >
> > Hmmm, hard to say but looking at the netmask (192) and assigned/used
> > addresses: 193 used, 200-253 reserved, looks like 5 or six IP left for
> > assignment..... (depending upon what else is assigned in that netblock)


Actually, the config you sent showed the virtual-template in that block (at 
193), you say the router was (that makes two IP) and 200 through 253 are 
"reserved" which means you likely had "five" (5) ip addresses to "assign" 
from what was left (routers viewpoint, not mine)....

-- 
Larry Smith
SysAd ECSIS.NET
sysad at ecsis.net