[c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 41, Issue 52

[Mark Tohill]

Hi,

Just on that same thread, I was wondering has anyone thoughts on how
best to connect two 6509 Chassis with one Sup720 in each and one
(6748)Gig blade each.

This is to sit between assorted access switches (2950's, 2970's...) and
2 x 7200VXR(NPE-G1) edge.

I realise there are not many connectivity 'options', but if there are,
what implications do they have for redundancy/convergence?

What I'm asking is if there is a way to interconnect this kit to
minimize downtime and maximize resiliency, what is it? Is it better to
use, for example, the 2 x gig ports on each Sup720 to connect to other
Sup or better to use blade ports? Or maybe it doesn't matter...??

Thanks,
Mark


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:51:20 +0300 (IDT)
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Sup 720 dual engine configurations
To: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0604132040150.27971 at efes.iucc.ac.il>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Voll, Scott wrote:

I have used Cisco routers for close to 20 years:
http://tinyurl.com/l4jtj
and have yet to have the CPU die on me.  That is true for dozens of
AGSs,
AGS+s, 7200s, many 7500s (RSPs) and now two 7600s (SUP720s), among my
many
clients.  Everything else has failed at some point such as PAs,
Flexwans,
GBICs, SFPs, but never yet the chassis or supervisor card.  That is why
I
didn't suggest to buy redundant SUPs.

-Hank

> Depends on how long you can go without the Router.  If you are using
it
> at your core, how long can you be down?  And what kind of SmartNet
> contract do you have.
>
> We have decided that at one location we can be down 2 hours so we went
> with one but got smartnet of 24x7x2hour and at another location we
can't
> be down so we have two 720 and 24x7x4hour smartnet.
>
> >From my experience the redundancy on layer 2 interfaces have been two
or
> three Ping packets.  Layer 3 interfaces (ie FlexWAN) has been much
> longer then that <60 seconds.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of George
Antoniou
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:50 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Sup 720 dual engine configurations
>
> Hi,
>
> We're contemplating installing 2 sup720 engine per chassis -- does it
> make sense to have that type of redundancy / spare?  Are there tech
> notes on ensuring that the config is done correctly (dependency
> analysis) -- i.e. no impact to bgp, igrp, etc when the primary engine
> fails?
>
> Any links, thoughts, experience-shared would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> George
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
>  at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
>