[c-nsp] 200 FE ports, half of those PoE

[Tom Sands]

We use 3560's as well for over 600 phones.  Depending on the type/rating 
of the phone you can get good density out of the 48 port model.


Voll, Scott wrote:

> Cost wise you can't beat the express 500's.  but we use the 3560.
> Better platform (ios) rather then web based and the E500's can't do
> everything a regular switch can do.  There's been some talk on the
> Cisco-Voip list about it.  The E500 is Very basic.
> 
> If you're looking for high density you will need to look at 45xx or
> 65xx.
> 
> Just my 2 cents
> 
> Scott
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vincent De
> Keyzer
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 7:13 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] 200 FE ports, half of those PoE
> 
> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> our IT guys are stacking 24-ports CatalystExpress 500 in the room behind
> me,
> and I am wondering if there is no better solution than that?
> 
>  
> 
> We have 200 (mostly FE, some GE) ports; half of which should be PoE (for
> IP
> phones).
> 
>  
> 
> What would you suggest?
> 
>  
> 
> Vincent
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 

-- 
------------------------------------------------------
Tom Sands			  				
Chief Network Engineer				
Rackspace Managed Hosting	    	
(210)447-4065		   	
------------------------------------------------------