[c-nsp] 6500 sup32 v sup720

Peter Salanki peter.salanki at bahnhof.net
Mon Aug 7 10:57:15 EDT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

If you got the same pricing, go with the sup720, but make sure it's  
sup720-3bxl. For your traffic amount, a sup32 would be enough, but  
sup720 has a faster CPU which is a key factor when handling full  
tables (in my opinion, the sup720 CPU could be a LOT faster for that  
price).

7 aug 2006 kl. 16.31 skrev Alex Foster:

> Hi,
>
> Im in the decision making phase of upgrading our existing BGP routers
> (3550s) to something more suitable to receive the full routing table
> etc;  Ive been looking at the 6500 - and have received some pricing  
> for
> the sup32 and sup720 variants.  Problem is the pricing is almost
> identical - and I cant work out where the gotchas are...ie:  the  
> sup720
> is capable of 32/256/720Gbps whereas the sup32 is only 32Gbps  
> capable -
> where are the hidden costs here ?? What additional modules/hardware  
> do I
> require when going from 32Gbps to say 256Gbps on the sup720 and  
> what is
> the upgrade path.
>
> Would appreciate your thoughts and comments on this...or indeed is the
> 6500 the best box to go with - I have a good budget and basically  
> need a
> box capable of receiving full routes/upto 2Gbps traffic rates/and  
> plenty
> of optical GigE and 10/100/1000 interfaces.
>
> Regards
>
> Alex
>
>
> The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential  
> and may be subject to legal professional privilege. It is intended  
> solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you  
> are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for  
> delivering this information to the intended recipient, please  
> notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended  
> recipient or his/her representative you are prohibited from, and  
> therefore must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this  
> message or any part of it. The views expressed in this e-mail may  
> not represent those of Gamma Telecom.
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses by MailController
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Sincerely

Peter Salanki
Chief Network Engineer
Bahnhof AB (AS8473)
www.bahnhof.se
Office: +46855577132
Cell: +46709174932


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFE11TLiQKhdiFGiogRAvVcAJ4meFFvso6rwl6X/kojHrJ/K4/gjgCfVWFl
EjHn5ILmGpRGvavLRGlX8RY=
=bYEW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list