[c-nsp] Sup720 maximum memory?

[Kristofer Sigurdsson]

Ahh...haven't had my cup of tea yet. :-)  I assumed the OP was really
just worried about the size of the IPv4 TCAM.

-Kristo

2006/8/10, Ed Butler <ed.butler at rapidswitch.com>:
> Yes, we're aware of the 239k IPv4 TCAM limitation. But the problem isn't
> that, it's when you run modular IOS and have a few full tables of ~190k
> routes, you get through 512mb system memory very quickly.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Butler
> RapidSwitch Ltd
> DDI: 020 7106 0731
>
> RapidSwitch Ltd, 5th Floor, Sovereign House, 227 Marsh Wall, London, E14
> 9SD
>
> This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains
> information that may be confidential and/or copyright.  If you are not
> the intended recipient please notify the sender by reply email and
> immediately delete this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this
> email by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
> prohibited. No representation is made that this email or any attachments
> are free of viruses. Virus scanning is recommended and is the
> responsibility of the recipient.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at greenie.muc.de]
> Sent: 10 August 2006 11:27
> To: Kristofer Sigurdsson
> Cc: Ed Butler; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 maximum memory?
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:20:37AM +0000, Kristofer Sigurdsson wrote:
> > I don't think you can - for full views, you really need the -3BXL
> > (IIRC, $40k USD list).
>
> Don't mix "DRAM memory" (BGP views, etc.) with "TCAM memory" (number of
> routes).
>
> gert
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>
> //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025
> gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>