[c-nsp] MPLS TE Autoroute with OSPF and IS-IS?

[Adam Greene]

Pete,

It would be interesting to know as well from a very high-level standpoint
what's motivated you to switch to IS-IS from OSPF ....

Best,
Adam

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <oboehmer at cisco.com>
To: "Pete Templin" <petelists at templin.org>; "Cisco Nsp"
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS TE Autoroute with OSPF and IS-IS?


> Pete Templin <> wrote on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:21 PM:
>
> > Anyone ever switch from OSPF to IS-IS with MPLS TE and autoroute in
> > place?  We're working through a "ships in the night" rollout of IS-IS,
> > and have now noticed that our tunnels aren't being substituted for the
> > physical links in our RIB and FIB.  Any guidance on this topic?
>
> hmm, not sure I understand. You're running OSPF in your network, and now
> deployed ISIS and enabled TE with ISIS? And you don't see any ISIS paths
> via the tunnel? Please clarify..
>
> oli
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> ---
> [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by our AntiVirus Protection System]
>
>

---
[This e-mail was scanned for viruses by our AntiVirus Protection System]