[c-nsp] High processor utilization on c12008 4port STM-1 line card

[Primoz Jeroncic]

Hi

Unfortunately I have more then 260MBps to move. That's reason why we are
upgrading to STM-4, but until upgrade is done, I have to stick with those
STM-1. That's also reason, why I would like to get those "additional" 20Mbps
per port :)
I tried to remove rate limiting from config and everything looks much
better. CPU went down to kinda normal and it looks everything is
running better... at the moment :)

And thanks for other suggestions about moving second port to additional
card. I actually have second card in GSR which is not doing anything
so this might be pretty good thing to try.

Thanks to everyone for help with this.

Have nice rest of day,
Primoz


On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:

> 1) Maybe you don't have more than 260 Mbps of traffic to move?  Are
> you seeing packet loss?
>
> 2) what's the prognosis for getting more bandwidth?  you're running
> kind of hot...
> 3) Those cards are Engine 0 cards and pretty anemic.  You could turn
> off the QoS stuff and see if things get better.
> 4) It's packets/second that really thrashes these (and most
> software-based) cards.  How many pps are you running?
> 5) Those cards are fairly cheap on the secondary market (like, under
> $500 apiece if I remember right).  You might want to consider
> splitting your traffic onto two cards on both ends instead of two
> ports on one card and see how much your CPU situation improves.
>
>                                         ---Rob
>
> Primoz Jeroncic <jp at softnet.si> writes:
>
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > We have few c12008 and between two of them we have 2x STM-1 links.
> > Based on my MRTG, link payload doesn't go over 130Mbps, even though on
> > SONET its suppose to go all the way to 150Mbps (I might be wrong about
> > this, but I think I'm not). This means we get only about 260Mbps instead
> > of 300Mbps (we run OSPF for load balancing on those two links). After
> > a bit of research, I found out that line card (on 4 port SONET STM-1 card)
> > processor utilization is somewhere around 80% or even higher, while route
> > processor utilization is around 10%.
> >
> > Now I have question if there's any way to get this thing down, since
> > I have feeling to high utilization on line card's processor is reason
> > why I can't get payload higher. Would more packet memory help reducing
> > processor utilization?
> >
> > Current hardware config is following:
> > - c12008 with GRP-B route processor and 512MB memory
> > - 4 port SONET OC-3c/STM-1 line card with 256MB processor memory, 64MB
> > TX Packet Memory and 64MB RX Packet Memory.
> > - few additional line cards (8x FE card and 1x GE card)
> >
> > PS: In case if it matters... I do have some rate limiting configured on
> > POS interfaces.
> >
> > Thanks for any help.
> >
> > Have fun,
> > Primoz Jeroncic
> > Support - IP Connectivity & Routing
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Softnet d.o.o.  tel:  +386 1 562 31 40   |
> > Borovec 2       fax:  +386 1 562 18 55   |       1 + 1 = 3
> > 1236 Trzin      primoz(at)softnet.si     | for larger values of 1
> > Slovenija       http://flea.softnet.si/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

Have fun,
Primoz Jeroncic
Support - IP Connectivity & Routing
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Softnet d.o.o.  tel:  +386 1 562 31 40   |
Borovec 2       fax:  +386 1 562 18 55   |       1 + 1 = 3
1236 Trzin      primoz(at)softnet.si     | for larger values of 1
Slovenija       http://flea.softnet.si/
-------------------------------------------------------------------