[c-nsp] DR and BDR election
Brian Johnson
bjohnson at drtel.com
Tue Aug 22 17:31:04 EDT 2006
I don't think this really answers this question, which I would like to
know also. ;-)
The Cisco document in the link mentions the following about a priority
of 0:
A priority value of zero indicates an interface which is not to
be elected as DR or BDR.
The state of the interface with priority zero will be DROTHER.
This does not tell us what will happen if all interfaces have a priority
of 0.
Any ideas?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Pinsky
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 12:40 PM
> To: Atiqur Rahman Mohammed
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DR and BDR election
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Atiqur Rahman Mohammed wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > What would happen when there are n numbers of routers attached to a
> > broadcast access network and the router priority of each
> router is set to 0?
> >
> >
> > Will there be any DR or BDR election happens at all.
> >
> > If yes what would be the basis for DR election.
> >
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/2.html#10.1
>
> - --
> =========
> bep
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFE60FnE1XcgMgrtyYRAv0gAJwN0jHK1HL5jZNANtyv3Sz5/vERSQCgv5cA
> jWmeh80ag4ivX5Vrc09P95I=
> =Am6+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list