[c-nsp] Disable ARP

[Francois Corthésy]

Not to mention the waste of IPv4 space. Assigning a /30 per customer 
would have the guys at RIPE give you some pretty mean looks the next 
time you go to one of their meetings.

I remember the last one I was at, they even implied the assigning fix IP 
addresses to end users (think ADSL/Cable) was no recommended and either 
translation or DHCP should be used.


Francois

Alex A. Pavlenko wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gert Doering" <gert at greenie.muc.de>
> To: "Alex A. Pavlenko" <lex at sandy.ru>
> Cc: "Gert Doering" <gert at greenie.muc.de>; <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 5:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Disable ARP
>
>
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 05:48:04PM +0400, Alex A. Pavlenko wrote:
>>     
>>> what do you mean "their own L3 segment"? Does it mean one VLAN with 
>>> /30(assuming one computer per customer)  addressing for one customer?
>>>       
>> Yep. /30, /29, /24 (according to need) IPv4 address space, and /64 IPv6.
>>
>> gert
>>
>>     
> Hmm,
> 802.1q supports 4096 vlans if I'm not mistaken. What to do if there are more than 
> 4K customers?
>
> Alex.
>
>   
>> -- 
>> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>>                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
>> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
>> fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>