[c-nsp] T-1 module card for Cisco 2811

[Joe Maimon]

Can any suggest any reason to prefer the WIC-1DSU-T1-V2 which is only 
compatible on the x8xx series over the VWIC-MFT which are compatible 
most everywhere (except on 1600 I believe) and come channelized, voice 
capable, integrated csu/dsu and available with two ports?

nealr wrote:

>  Chuck,
> 
>       Silly me - the WIC-1DSU-T1 requires version 2, as do some of the 
> other single port devices with integrated CSU. I've just flipped open my 
> February 2006 spiral bound sales guide and it would appear plain ol' 
> VWIC-whatever are supported in the 28xx. This seems a little funny to me 
> and I'm going to double check by plugging a first generation VWIC into a 
> 28xx on Monday because this is going to save us a lot of money, too.
> 
> 
> 
>                                                                                                           
> Neal
> 
> Church, Chuck wrote:
> 
>>Neal,
>>
>>	Are you saying the VWIC-2MFT-T1= won't work in a 2800/3800?
>>Everything we've read said they will.  Just want to make sure.  We're
>>currently ordering 2800s to replace a bunch of 2600s, hoping to not get
>>hit with a big surprise...
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Chuck Church
>>Multimax Network Engineer, CCIE #8776
>>EDS Contractor, Multimax - Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI)
>>1210 N. Parker Rd. | Greenville, SC 29609 
>>Office: 864-335-9473 | Cell: 864-266-3978
>>cchurch at multimax.com
>> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of nealr
>>Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 1:25 PM
>>To: Rudy Setiawan
>>Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] T-1 module card for Cisco 2811
>>
>>
>>   That is a correct part number for the 28xx series. The older 
>>VWIC-2MFT would not work.
>>
>>   The card provides two channelized T1 controllers. If one wanted to 
>>use these for data the steps would be defining the channels used which 
>>will create a 'virtual' serial interface. If the desired effect is 3 
>>mbits full duplex I would do this by assigning a /30 to each end of each
>>
>>circuit then using equal cost routing to load balance the links. There 
>>may be some clever way to bond them with PPP so that the pair look like 
>>a single interface but, alas, I am not terribly clever.
>>
>>Setting up controllers for data:
>>
>>controller T1 0/0/0
>> framing esf
>> linecode b8zs
>> channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24
>>!
>>controller T1 0/0/1
>> framing esf
>> linecode b8zs
>> channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24
>>
>>
>>Example of how a serial interface created using the above commands would
>>
>>appear.
>>
>>interface Serial0/0/0:0
>> ip addr 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Rudy Setiawan wrote:
>>  
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1, does this module card allow the bonded(multilink)
>>>    
>>
>>T-1?
>>  
>>
>>>Or is it just based on software?
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Rudy Setiawan
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>>  
>>>    
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
>