[c-nsp] Selecting an eBGP destination based on the source network.
David Sinn
dsinn at dsinn.com
Thu Dec 14 18:24:57 EST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Another way to do what sounds to be sourced based routing would be to
look at multiple route tables. So deploy a VPN/VRF model with a
route table mapping to each of the customer classes you have. Within
the VPN/VRF you have the routes prioritize in the way you detail below.
David
On Dec 14, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Rick Ernst wrote:
> It's a forwarding decision.
>
> "Customer class A" would prefer high-speed/high-quality outbound
> links and
> fall back to low-speed/low-cost links in case of failure, while
> "Customer
> class B" would prefer the low-speed/low-cost links and fall back to
> the
> high-speed/high-quality links.
>
> The key would be determining the destination based on source
> network, and
> my initial thought was doing something with next-hop, but that
> raises a
> possible reachability problem if the next-hop isn't available.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, December 14, 2006 14:47, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Rick Ernst wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm trying to find some way to prefer an outbound eBGP peer based
>>> on the
>>> internal source network. The idea is to prefer a particular
>>> provider
>>> for
>>> specific source networks due to SLA, performance, or other issues.
>>>
>>> I've looked at conditional announcements and set ip next-hop, but
>>> they
>>> don't seem to be designed for what I'm looking at.
>>>
>>> Am I missing something obvious, or is there some other way to
>>> accomplish
>>> this?
>>> It's easy to modify the inbound path based on outbound
>>> announcements,
>>> but
>>> once the multiple eBGP routes have made it into the (redundant)
>>> core (RR
>>> server) FIB, there is no control over where the traffic goes.
>>>
>>
>> Are you trying to alter the forwarding decision or the route
>> selection?
>>
>> My take is that you want to make forwarding decisions based on source
>> address rather than destination address. In that case, you would
>> want
>> Policy Based Routing. So you would set the IP next-hop based on the
>> source
>> address.
>>
>> If you are trying to alter the route selection based on some
>> criteria like
>> performance or SLAs, you may be able to do something with
>> Optimized Edge
>> Routing.
>>
>> - --
>> =========
>> bep
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>
>> iD8DBQFFgdSfE1XcgMgrtyYRAjCRAKCHhSo6E9Ntoo5Bs27bbQVrr+ZeswCg4Rpl
>> UiOrHBIydwWsV8azzc/f2lM=
>> =wLE+
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFgd1MLa9jIE3ZamMRAveWAKDd/NMXMwi7wVMSFXKr+uzTw1/CyACfXKPV
stCvkwQ27trYxHotdOZQwIQ=
=gGWB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list