[c-nsp] x800 router for BGP

[Church, Chuck]

Even the various 1800s should be able to do this.  They don't lag too
far behind the 2801.


Chuck 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin M.
Streiner
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:48 PM
To: Ian MacKinnon
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] x800 router for BGP

On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Ian MacKinnon wrote:

> What x800 series would people recommend as an alternative to a 7206
> for a simple BGP set up.
> Only advertising a /24 and accepting a default route and doing a max
> of 10M ethernet traffic

I've done a very simple BGP setup for a client using a 2801.  Two 
providers, a T1 to one and ethernet to the other, accepting a BGP 
generated default from each and announcing only one prefix to both.
This 
puts very little load on the router.

Would I try to do full routes on it?  No :-)

jms
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/