FW: [c-nsp] x800 router for BGP

[Resad Rovcanin]

Tried 2811 with default 256MB, SP IOS. Works fine with one full-table BGP
peer. We added another peer with just few routes, it works but it crashed
few times so far due to lack of memory I guess. Not too much stress on CPU
though (6-7Mb of traffic in total)

RR

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Ian MacKinnon
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 8:26 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] x800 router for BGP


Thanks Guys,
Good info

On 2/2/06, Church, Chuck <cchurch at netcogov.com> wrote:
> Even the various 1800s should be able to do this.  They don't lag too
> far behind the 2801.
>
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin M.
> Streiner
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:48 PM
> To: Ian MacKinnon
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] x800 router for BGP
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Ian MacKinnon wrote:
>
> > What x800 series would people recommend as an alternative to a 7206
> > for a simple BGP set up.
> > Only advertising a /24 and accepting a default route and doing a max
> > of 10M ethernet traffic
>
> I've done a very simple BGP setup for a client using a 2801.  Two
> providers, a T1 to one and ethernet to the other, accepting a BGP
> generated default from each and announcing only one prefix to both.
> This
> puts very little load on the router.
>
> Would I try to do full routes on it?  No :-)
>
> jms
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/