[c-nsp] Cisco PXF
Rodney Dunn
rodunn at cisco.com
Mon Feb 6 14:02:29 EST 2006
It's a bug. Open a TAC case if you have a contract.
We may not support that portion of NAT in the hardware
forwarding path but on those platforms at least there
is a punt path and that should be taken. The performance
will be pretty horrible but at least the packets would go through.
That's not always the case on some other hardware forwarding platforms
that are "all features in hardware or it doesn't work at all" scenario.
It's been said a lot of times on this alias. If the features you want
are not done in hardware and you are on a platform that has hardware
based forwarding most of the time it's probably the wrong platform
for you. That is unless the rates are really really low and you understand
the impact.
Rodney
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 03:59:26PM +0200, Palis Michael wrote:
> We are running a couple of C7304 and C7400 and we have problems with NAT
> Traversal and PXF. Enabling PXF, VPN clients using NAT Traversal do not
> work. Disabling PXF everything is OK. Note that we are Natting on the C7304
> and C7400..
>
> Can you please advice?
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.2/251 - Release Date: 4/2/2006
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list