[c-nsp] Mpls on fastethernet <-> atm route-bridge ip link?
Sean Watkins
sean at northrock.bm
Wed Feb 8 13:21:17 EST 2006
Hi,
Anyone ever setup mpls on a fastethernet <-> atm route-bridge ip link?
Ie, one side
interface FastEthernet5/0
bandwidth 100000
ip address X.110 255.255.255.252
load-interval 30
duplex full
tag-switching mtu 1508
tag-switching ip
.
...
Service providers ATM network
...
..
to
interface ATM3/0.80 point-to-point
bandwidth 100000
ip address X.109 255.255.255.252
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
atm route-bridged ip
tag-switching mtu 1508
pvc 80/50
tx-ring-limit 3
TDP brings the link up, and I can see lables on both sides, but there
appears to be a MTU issue as web pages die when the switching begins.
I verified the link can do 1500 bytes, with an extended ping with DF set
Rtr#ping X.110 df-bit source atm3/0.80 size 1500
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 1500-byte ICMP Echos to X.110, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of X.109
Packet sent with the DF bit set
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 40/40/44 ms
Rtr#
Pinging anything bigger, dies:
Rtr#ping X.110 df-bit source atm3/0.80 size 1502
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 1502-byte ICMP Echos to X.110, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of X.109
Packet sent with the DF bit set
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
I'm trying to verify with the service provider that they support jumbo
frames - but are there any known issues using MPLS on a link such as the
above? In testing regular fast ethernet ports, the same ping fails after
1500.
The service providers fastethernet port is attached to a Newbridge/Alcatel
36170 - anyone have any experiencing using jumbo frames on that gear?
Sean
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list