[c-nsp] Re: Load-sharing to 18 subinterfaces

[Kim Onnel]

Someone said:

IF you cant do L2 (ATM IMA nor MLPPP) then its L3, run BGP with customer
over three diff. loopbacks over your PE ? how does that sound ?

On 2/19/06, Kim Onnel <karim.adel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Its a Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
> IOS (tm) RPM Software (RPM-JS-M), Version 12.2(14.4)T,  MAINTENANCE
> INTERIM SOFTWARE
>
> We couldnt route more than 8 subnet, with a newer IOS, i was told we can
> put 10, but we need 14.
>
> One idea is to divide them each in a different VRF and from there, its no
> more load balancing, its load sharing, does that make sense ?
>
> On 2/19/06, Kim Onnel <karim.adel at gmail.com > wrote:
> >
> > Physical setup:
> >
> > 18 Customers links ---- DSLAM ---- PE ---- Core
> >
> > On the PE router, we configured 18 subinterfaces for a customer,
> > load-sharing per-packet under the interfaces isnt working, because there is
> > a limitation on routing subnets on a number of interfaces, the simplest
> > solution is to put a diff. router for the customer, but what other solutions
> > are there other than multilink (CPU Killer) ?
> >
>
>