[c-nsp] UDLD - why is default 60 seconds?
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Feb 23 17:01:52 EST 2006
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2006-02-23 18:32 +0200), Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> > <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080160ecf.html>
> >
> > Why is the default probe message time 60 seconds and in addition one can
> > only go as low as 7 seconds? If a GE port suddenly becomes
> > unidirectional, I would like to know about in 1-2 seconds and not after 7
> > seconds, so that the link is forced down and OSPF turns to an alternate
> > path. Or am I missing something?
>
> Valid question, which I don't have answer to, I agree they're quite
> conservative. But I'd suggest that you'll solve your rapid IGP
> livelyness detection with BFD instead, UDLD only helps in very spesific
> problem, which should happen extremely rarely.
Thanks. Will take up the suggestion. -Hank
>
> Also you may want to complement UDLD with STP loopguard, to cover
> another corner case (mainly STP software issues).
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hank
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
> --
> ++ytti
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
> at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list