[c-nsp] RIP and Secondary IP (Part Two)
Fernando Rojas
frsanchez at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 07:41:22 EST 2006
It is peculiar to see as if I clear in fastethernet0 a secondary IP in
subnet 172.16.1.0/24 ( 172.16.1.1 or 172.16.1.3) , RIP sends updates
correctly!! why this way it works?
Deactivate Split Horizon under FastEthernet0 is not good solution for my
network.
----------
Hi,
I have migrated the configuration from a 1600 to 1800 Cisco Router.
In a 1600, RIP is sending v2 update correctly. But with the same
configuration, 1800 is not sending a update.
In a debug IP RIP:
00:47:21: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via FastEthernet0 (172.18.1.1)
00:47:21: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
I have this configuration in a router 1801:
interface FastEthernet0
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 172.18.1.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.248.0
no ip redirects
ip nat inside
ip rip advertise 5
ip virtual-reassembly
ip policy route-map InterLAN
speed 100
full-duplex
no cdp enable
router rip
version 2
timers basic 5 15 30 60
redistribute connected
redistribute static
network 172.18.0.0
neighbor 172.18.1.2
!
no ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.4
ip route 192.168.9.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.4
ip route 192.168.11.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.4
ip route 192.168.15.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.4
!
!
I recevied correctly update route from a neighbor (172.18.1.2),
but this router is not advertised nothing!
IOS version: 12.4(2)XA ... Also update IOS router with lastest version (
12.4.4T1), but it did not work.
Somebody can help me?
Thanks in advance!
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list