[c-nsp] Cisco core router (for smaller sized colocation provider)
recomendations please
Pete Templin
petelists at templin.org
Tue Jan 24 09:08:07 EST 2006
Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
> In Josh's case, particularly given his minimal routing scenario, I
> respectfully disagree. One particular installation with which I'm
> acquainted has a pair of GSRs, original GRPs, two external BGP full
> views (and ibgp between the two GSRs), on the order of 200 routes in
> OSPF, and each box had over 50 megs free when running pre-ST-merge
> 12.0S, and today, running 12.0S-latest, still has about 35 megs free.
> Non-B (original) GRPs with 256m of memory. "p" images.
Wow. OK, note taken.
For reference, a GRP-B 512MB running 12.0(32)S (yeah, it's brand new;
outbound route-map continue is a definite benefit for us, but 12.0(31)S?
would crash in <1min if we tried to use it) with one external full view,
NO IBGP full views, ~150 OSPF routes, and ~1500 internal routes learned
via IBGP (i.e. this box sends all customer traffic to our customers, but
anything else goes to its EBGP neighbor):
edge1-ifmt#sh mem sum
Head Total(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b)
Largest(b)
Processor 55F4D120 436940512 203947248 232993264 231676592
228914916
Yes, it's only 203M used, but that's out of a pot of 436M, and the free
is comfortably below 256MB. I'm thinking 256MB wouldn't work in my
scenario.
My $0.02,
pt
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list