[c-nsp] How the "best" route is selected (OSPF)
Yuri Selivanov
uri at tomsknet.ru
Fri Jan 27 11:00:55 EST 2006
Hi Kristofer!
[snip]
> The scenerio: Same network, learned through two seperate OSPF processes,
> same type (I tried external 1 and external 2). This route is in the
> OSPF databases
> for both processes.
> The only difference is the metric. It's much higher in one of the
> processes, as it's
> preferred.
> Now, the way I understand it, the route with the lower metric should
> always be chosen and put into the routing table. However, it seems
As far as I understand there is no way to compare two *equal-AD*
routes received from different procs:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_white_paper09186a0080531fd2.shtml#routepref
> that the route that's injected first wins. Even if the other one pops
> in only a few minutes later, as long as the first one is valid, it
> continues to be the one in the routing table.
... and result of this race depends on realization.
[snip]
> Thanks,
> -Kristo
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Best Regards,
Yuri Selivanov [URI2-RIPE]
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list