[c-nsp] sup720 CoPP/ratelimiters

[Phil Rosenthal]

On Jan 30, 2006, at 12:09 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:

> On (2006-01-30 12:01 -0500), Phil Rosenthal wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2006, at 5:47 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>>
>>> My main pains about CoPP:
>>>
>>> 1) no ARP (7600), CLNS matches supported
>>> -you can't CAR non matching traffic to 0bps, you'd kill your IS-IS
>>>
>>
>> I have my non-matching traffic CAR'd to 0bps, and it works fine.
>
>  As far as I know, IS-IS is trasnported over CLNS, not IS-IS over  
> IPv4.
> Why it may work for you is that CLNS traffic doesn't hit even the  
> default
> rule, which is not guaranteed, as it's not supported. When it is  
> (if ever)
> supported, behaviour might change.
>
I've confirmed with packet analyzers that when you enable RSVP, the  
only new protocol number is 46, and when you enable IS-IS the only  
new protocol number is 124.

When I didn't have this rule, IS-IS didn't come up, when I added this  
rule, it did.

I'm very sure that these rules *do work*.