[c-nsp] Gracefully remove a port from Etherchannel
Ed Butler
ed.butler at rapidswitch.com
Thu Jun 8 09:19:07 EDT 2006
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:31:59AM +0100, Ed Butler wrote:
> Yesterday we unplugged a port from etherchannel, and were not
> expecting this to affect traffic flow. However, the logs on the Cisco
> 3750 show the OSPF adjacency went down and immediately came back up.
>
> 20w1d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> GigabitEthernet1/0/24, changed state to down
> 20w1d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24, changed state
> to down
> 20w1d: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr x.y.x.y on Vlan164 from FULL to
> DOWN, Neighbor Down: Dead timer expired
> 20w1d: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr x.y.x.y on Vlan164 from LOADING
> to FULL, Loading Done
>
> 1) Is this supposed to happen?
> 2) Is there a way of gracefully removing a port from an etherchannel
> (eg
> shutdown) to ensure problems don't get caused?
> 3) If the answers to the above are "Yes" and "No" respectively, should
> etherchannel be used to give some redundancy?
Are you using LACP or PAGP or nothing?
aw
>> We are using LACP with "channel-group 3 mode active"
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list