[c-nsp] Route-Map "AND" clause

[Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)]

hjan at libero.it <> wrote on Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:46 AM:

> Is there anyone that know if it's possible to use an AND, or
> something like an AND, clause in a route-map ? 
> 
> If i wrote :
> access-list 10 permit 0.0.0.0
> access-list 11 permit 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.2
> 
> route-map RED deny 10
>  match ip address 10 11
> route-map RED permit 20
> 
> Defaul behaviour of route-map is to match the deny if a packet match
> one of the access-list statement. 
> Is there any way to force the route-map for work only if match both
> access-list statement? 

unfortunately not, but you could obviously create a single ACL covering
both ACE's.

> The continue clause is reserved for bgp route-map only, but in this
> specific case i need to apply this map to an eigrp process. 
> In fact i need to redistribute a network from an eigrp process, name
> it 1, in another eigrp process, name it 2, only if eigrp process 1
> goes down. In my mind i have thought to make this with route-map but
> i have some trouble with the match behaviour.  

not sure I understand. what do you mean by "only if eigrp process 1 is
down"? can you elaborate?

	oli