[c-nsp] EMI image on 3750-48PS
B
bms314 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 28 12:38:16 EDT 2006
Thanks for the responses.
Follow up question to this....
If I have SMI only images and want to upgrade, can the EMI image be
downloaded from CCO if the licenses are purchased? Or does Cisco send the
upgrade kit via CDROM?
On 6/28/06, Charles J. Boening <charlieb at cot.net> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> You will get a software mismatch error if they don't all match and you
> won't get working ports for any switch but the master. I went through
> the same thing and I think that's how it worked. I do remember getting
> the software mismatch and I'm pretty sure I remember ports on the slave
> not working.
>
> Given that, I'd also say if you want EMI on all switches in the stack,
> then you should have EMI licenses for all switches in the stack to be
> legal.
>
>
> Charlie
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Kell
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 6:36 PM
> > To: Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EMI image on 3750-48PS
> >
> > Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
> > >> If full dynamic IP routing is required on a stack of two 3750-48PS
> > >> switches utilizing the stacking cable, is the EMI image
> > required on
> > >> both switches or can one have the standard image?
> > >>
> >
> > >> >From a redundancy viewpoint, it would be a bad idea to have IP
> > >> Services on only one of them...
> > >> Also, it's easier to administer (e.g. to upgrade software), when
> > >> they're running the same software.
> >
> > So what is the bottom line? Can you mix EMI/SMI in the same
> > stack or not? If you lose the [last] EMI does it crash in a
> > spectacular manner? :-)
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQFEohyvcGGHuFdGSWARAirwAJ4m6vFaKX12pYCVM4nbwRKwWo+b+QCggudy
> ZhRg62X8XLbRALd0h8uXbhU=
> =6j0Q
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list