[c-nsp] Gigabit EtherChannel
Joe Maimon
jmaimon at ttec.com
Thu Jun 29 08:43:19 EDT 2006
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
> Jon Lewis <mailto:jlewis at lewis.org> wrote on Wednesday, June 28, 2006
>>If the bandwidth is (or becomes) much higher than what a single GEIP
>>can handle, wouldn't it be a bad idea unless the goal is just
>>redundancy?
>>Won't the single GEIP+ on its own handle about as much traffic as a
>>GEIP & GEIP+ etherchannel can handle?
>
>
> I did not talk about performance of the whole thing. a GEIP or GEIP+ on
> a 7500 will not do line-rate (given IMIX) anyway, so I assumed that this
> is targeted for redundancy reason, rather than load.. I guess you are
> right, a GEIP+ by itself will likely provide similar performance
> compared to a GEIP&GEIP+ channel at the end..
>
> oli
>
Wouldnt spreading the load across multiple vip4-80 effectively increase
the available throughput? SO in that sense, yes this would be a
performance benefit.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list