[c-nsp] GSR ge-gbic-sc-b traffic limit?

[Peter Salanki]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Maybe you don't have more than 225mbit traffic then? :)

6 mar 2006 kl. 18.28 skrev Kevin Scheunemann:

> Nope, Live internet Traffic.
>
> Kevin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Salanki [mailto:peter.salanki at bahnhof.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 11:25 AM
> To: Kevin Scheunemann
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GSR ge-gbic-sc-b traffic limit?
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Err,
> Sorry if I was unclear, I mean't how do you know you can't push more
> than 225mbits through it? You used two boxes with iperf or something?
>
> 6 mar 2006 kl. 18.05 skrev Kevin Scheunemann:
>
>> I get the result doing a "show interface gige 1/0"
>> As well as my cacti graph
>> Gige1/0:
>> 5 minute input rate 5495000 bits/sec, 7473 packets/sec
>> 5 minute output rate 216550000 bits/sec, 26513 packets/sec
>> Gige2/0:
>> 5 minute input rate 216709000 bits/sec, 26546 packets/sec
>> 5 minute output rate 5463000 bits/sec, 7415 packets/sec
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Peter Salanki [mailto:peter.salanki at bahnhof.net]
>> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 10:56 AM
>> To: Kevin Scheunemann
>> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GSR ge-gbic-sc-b traffic limit?
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> You should see a CPU increase as the bandwidth increases. How did you
>> get the result of 225mbit?
>>
>> /Peter Salanki
>> Bahnhof AB (AS8473)
>> Stockholm, Sweden
>>
>> 6 mar 2006 kl. 17.47 skrev Kevin Scheunemann:
>>
>>> I just put a 12008 into production this weekend with 1 grp-b and 2
>>> ge-gbic-sc-b with a full switch fabric.
>>> With my daily traffic load, I am unable to push more than 225Mbit/
>>> sec
>>
>>> or
>>> 26581 packets/sec.
>>> The cpu load on the linecards is really low 4% to 6%.
>>> I have one ACL on inbound traffic on one of the interfaces, I
>>> disabled
>>
>>> the acl for the interface but that did'nt help.
>>> Is there anything else I can check as to why the performance is'nt
>>> there?
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
>>
>> iD8DBQFEDGm9iQKhdiFGiogRApeFAKCPyouxFyUUoMjqymX2B/4g640M/ACfRDDq
>> ePbvGxqxWFSy1duSaSEhIEE=
>> =0emy
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFEDHBdiQKhdiFGiogRArzEAJ46unFtLOTSjksU8iCgWDcllrNdCgCfdE7H
> JfpWz2nZfJaj5y362H5fyHA=
> =WpPC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEDHKaiQKhdiFGiogRAtH4AJ9l0yJ4e8/5UCH2gqULVcNr4rqgIgCgkNyM
ToINMxNiMFqoCL37UekTVUc=
=F8F/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----