[c-nsp] GSR ge-gbic-sc-b traffic limit?

Kevin Scheunemann kevin at honeycomb.net
Mon Mar 13 16:07:13 EST 2006


I found out whas the problem was,
My upstream provider had some sort of flow control enabled on our
interface to them.
They disabled the flow control and the problem went away.
How confusing and fustrating, the link worked just fine on a 7513, but
then going to a 12008, flow control on their side killed the link?

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin
Scheunemann
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:39 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GSR ge-gbic-sc-b traffic limit?

I'm assuming your using a 3GE-GBIC-SC instead of a GE-GBIC-SC interface.
Does anyone know if cisco has a doc stating what interfaces are what
engine type?

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: kostas anagnopoulos [mailto:kostas.anagnopoulos at oteglobe.net]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 11:40 AM
To: Kevin Scheunemann
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] GSR ge-gbic-sc-b traffic limit?

Is it an ISE line card ?

show diag 1 | include L3
  L3 Engine: 3 - ISE OC48 (2.5 Gbps)

show inter gig 1/2
show inter gig 1/2 | include bits/sec,
  30 second input rate 582604000 bits/sec, 82116 packets/sec
  30 second output rate 57706000 bits/sec, 26254 packets/sec

Have seen ISE GiGe cards reaching ~3Gbps total traffic in real world

Kostas

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Kevin Scheunemann
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 7:05 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GSR ge-gbic-sc-b traffic limit?


I get the result doing a "show interface gige 1/0"
As well as my cacti graph
Gige1/0:
5 minute input rate 5495000 bits/sec, 7473 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 216550000 bits/sec, 26513 packets/sec
Gige2/0:
5 minute input rate 216709000 bits/sec, 26546 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 5463000 bits/sec, 7415 packets/sec

Kevin


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Salanki [mailto:peter.salanki at bahnhof.net]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 10:56 AM
To: Kevin Scheunemann
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GSR ge-gbic-sc-b traffic limit?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

You should see a CPU increase as the bandwidth increases. How did you
get the result of 225mbit?

/Peter Salanki
Bahnhof AB (AS8473)
Stockholm, Sweden

6 mar 2006 kl. 17.47 skrev Kevin Scheunemann:

> I just put a 12008 into production this weekend with 1 grp-b and 2 
> ge-gbic-sc-b with a full switch fabric.
> With my daily traffic load, I am unable to push more than 225Mbit/ sec

> or
> 26581 packets/sec.
> The cpu load on the linecards is really low 4% to 6%.
> I have one ACL on inbound traffic on one of the interfaces, I disabled

> the acl for the interface but that did'nt help.
> Is there anything else I can check as to why the performance is'nt 
> there?
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEDGm9iQKhdiFGiogRApeFAKCPyouxFyUUoMjqymX2B/4g640M/ACfRDDq
ePbvGxqxWFSy1duSaSEhIEE=
=0emy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.




--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.





_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/






More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list