[c-nsp] VOIP/QOS
Per Carlson
lists at ip4all.net
Mon Mar 13 07:55:40 EST 2006
On Mon Mar 13 15:59:40 2006 -0500, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Do I have to put a bandwidth allocation in place if I'm not worried (in
> this particular case) about congestion?
The priority command ensures that VoIP traffic is prioritized in
the *queueing*. So even if you are not worried about congestion,
sending the VoIP packets as soon as possible is a Good Thing.
> policy-map SIP
> class VOIP
> set ip precedence 2
You are absolutely free to choose whatever precedence for voice
traffic, but it is recommended (various Cisco guides and IETF
documents) to use the following "classes":
Voice traffic: precedence 5 (or DSCP EF)
Voice signalling: precedence 3 (or DSCP AF31)
Choosing a BCP approach will probably help you the day you need to
communicate with some other party (partner and/or service
provider).
--
/"\ |
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Per Carlson
X Against HTML Mail | Sr. Network Developer
/ \ |
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list