[c-nsp] Possible memory corruption w/ 12.2(18)S11

Rodney Dunn rodunn at cisco.com
Tue Mar 21 15:15:21 EST 2006


Can you please try a latest 12.3 or 12.4 image because
I couldn't get anything fixed in 12.2(18)S anyway.

We probably could in 12.2(25)S but I'd advise against that.

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 03:04:59PM -0500, David Coulson wrote:
> Rodney,
> 
> 	Just for reference. We also had the following symptoms in addition to
> the OSPF errors.
> 
> * High CPU load on the RSP (60%, rather than 10%)
> * Packet loss of process switched data (e.g. pings to the router, telnet
> sessions were flaky)
> * Really slow SNMP processing to the point where a snmp walk would throw
> out about 20 entries, then stall, then another 20. Scripts to monitor
> interfaces would take literally 20mins to run, where previously they
> took less than 5s.
> * Resets of OSPF from other gear on the network - They'd reset the
> session to the router we're seeing problems with.
> 
> Mar 20 23:38:53 adsl-gw 18449: Mar 20 23:38:52: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process
> 10, Nbr 207.166.219.1 on BVI100 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
> Mar 20 23:49:16 adsl-gw 18458: Mar 20 23:49:15: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process
> 10, Nbr 207.166.219.1 on BVI100 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
> Mar 21 00:51:12 adsl-gw 18529: Mar 21 00:51:11: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process
> 10, Nbr 207.166.219.1 on BVI100 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
> 
> Uncached IO solved all of these problems (apart from the CPU load issue,
> which actually got worse although process switched packets moved quicker)
> 
> 
> David


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list