[c-nsp] Possible memory corruption w/ 12.2(18)S11

[Eugene Vedistchev]

class-based shaping is something like:

class-map match-all 115
  match access-group 115
<multiple class-map>

policy-map inbound
  class 115
    shape average 1024000 4096 4096
<multiple class/shape statements>

FN and Software Advisor states that  class-based shaping exists in 12.0S 
and 12.2S for 7500. acl remark in 12.2S within them.

Eugene

--- Original Message ---

>On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:40:54PM +0200, Eugene Vedistchev wrote:
>  
>
>>acl remark (very important - customers) 
>>    
>>
>
>That's in 12.3 mainline and 12.4 mainline too:
>
>75xx_top(config)#ip access-list ex
>75xx_top(config)#ip access-list extended ?
>  <100-199>    Extended IP access-list number
>  <2000-2699>  Extended IP access-list number (expanded range)
>  WORD         Access-list name
>
>75xx_top(config)#ip access-list extended test
>75xx_top(config-ext-nacl)#rem
>75xx_top(config-ext-nacl)#remark ?
>  LINE  Comment up to 100 characters
>  <cr>
>
>75xx_top(config-ext-nacl)#do sh ver | incl IOS
>IOS (tm) RSP Software (RSP-PV-M), Version 12.3(17), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
>75xx_top(config-ext-nacl)#
>
>+ class-based shaping
>  
>
>
>What exact configuration do you mean by class-based shaping?
>
> 
>  
>
>>12.2.25S8
>>
>>eugene vedistchev
>>
>>--- Original Message ---
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Are you saying you have it replicated in the lab?
>>>
>>>The OSPF bad checksum just means that OSPF detects
>>>the packet doesn't have the correct checksum value
>>>when it runs it over the LSA's in the update.
>>>
>>>btw, can you guys list out the feature combinations
>>>that are requiring you to run 12.2S on the 75xx's?
>>>
>>>On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:06:45PM -0500, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, David Coulson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>12.2(18)S11 on 7507 w/ RSP4.
>>>>>
>>>>>We've been seeing this frequently (IP address of source varies)
>>>>>
>>>>>Mar 19 07:31:09 core1.clevoh.n2net.net 515: Mar 19 07:31:01:
>>>>>%OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: Bad Checksum from
>>>>>207.166.192.208, GigabitEthernet4/0/0.100
>>>>>
>>>>>If I do a 'memory cache-policy io uncached', it solves the problem,
>>>>>however it kills the CPU on the router.
>>>>>
>>>>>Is this potentially a hardware issue, or an IOS bug? We've moved the
>>>>>interface to a seperate GEIP (different GEIP, GBIC, fiber, GBIC, switch)
>>>>>and we get the same problem. We never encountered this on PA-FE or FEIPs.
>>>>>
>>>>>Does anyone have any suggestions for troubleshooting this, before I just
>>>>>go and load 12.2 on to it?
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>As a side note, this has been tested and replicated on a pair of 7507s 
>>>>running Dual RSP-4s w/ the same IOS version. That's two completely 
>>>>independent routers w/ completely different hardware...
>>>>
>>>>-- 
>>>>   Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
>>>>        http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
>>>>                            KP-216-121-ST
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>  
>